HTTP provides developers with a powerful set of tools to cache responses. Often times we don’t want a client to blindly cache content that it has been given. We may not be able to rely on setting specific expiration headers either. Instead we need a way for the client to ask the server whether or not a resource has been updated.
HTTP provides us with the ability to do this with conditional caching. A client can make a request to the server and find out of the server has a new version of the resource available.
Rails provides us with tools to take advantage of this. Before we jump into Rails, let’s discuss some of the common ways to check if a client’s cache is fresh or stale.
ETags
ETags, short for entity tags, are a common way to conditionally verify an HTTP cache. An ETag is a digest which represents the contents of a given resource.
When a response is returned by the server it will include an ETag to represent
the resource’s state as part of the HTTP response headers. Subsequent HTTP
requests which want to know whether or not the resource has changed since the
last request can send along the stored ETag via the If-None-Match
header.
The server will then compare the current ETag for the resource to the one provided by the client. If the two ETags match, the client’s cache is considered fresh and the server can respond with a “304 Not Modified” status.
If the resource has changed since the last time the client has requested the resource the server will respond with a new ETag and the updated response.
Last-Modified Timestamp
Another header that a server can supply is the Last-Modified
header.
As the name implies, this will return a timestamp of when the resource was last
modified. The client can then include an If-Modified-Since
header with the
Last-Modified
timestamp value to ask the server if the resource has been
modified since the previous request.
Again, if the resource has not been modified since the last request, the server
can respond with a “304 Not Modified” status. Otherwise, it will return an
updated representation of the resource and a new Last-Modified
timestamp for
next time.
Caching with fresh_when
Now that we’ve discussed the ETags and Last-Modified HTTP headers, let’s take a look at how we might use them within our Rails application.
ActionController
provides us with a powerful method called fresh_when
. It will use either
an ETag or a Last-Modified timestamp to determine whether or not a resource
is fresh or stale.
Imagine a simple Rails blog application with the following posts route / controller:
# app/controllers/posts_controller.rb
class PostsController < ApplicationController
def show
@post = Post.find(params[:id])
end
end
# config/routes.rb
Rails.application.routes.draw do
resources :posts
end
If we made a curl request to an individual post we might see something like:
curl -i http://localhost:3000/posts/1
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Etag: "4af7e17fc369c6d1af99f8994d8fd387"
Server: WEBrick/1.3.1 (Ruby/2.1.2/2014-05-08)
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
<h1>Blog post 1</h1>
<p>lorem ipsum</p>
</body>
</html>
Notice that we have not done anything particularly noteworthy, yet if we take a look at the headers returned as a part of the response we’ll see that Rails has sent along an ETag to represent the resource being returned.
If we keep making the same request via curl we’ll see a different ETag value even though the resource has not been modified since our previous request. This goes against the notion of what an ETag would be used for.
We’ll need to modify our controller to instruct it that a request is fresh when a post has not been modified since the last request.
# app/controllers/posts_controller.rb
class PostsController < ApplicationController
def show
@post = Post.find(params[:id])
fresh_when @post
end
end
Now if we make our previous request over again we’ll see that our ETag no longer changes on repeated requests:
curl -i http://localhost:3000/posts/1
Content-Length: 667
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Etag: "534279bfc931d4236713095ffd3efb28"
Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:44:46 GMT
Server: WEBrick/1.3.1 (Ruby/2.1.3/2014-09-19)
Upon closer inspection of the updated HTTP headers returned in the response,
we’ll notice that the server has also started returning a Last-Modified
timestamp for the post resource.
Our work is not complete.
In order to use our cache we need to verify it against the server with the ETag
or last modified timestamp with either the If-None-Match
or
If-Modified-Since
headers respectively.
curl -i -H 'If-None-Match: "534279bfc931d4236713095ffd3efb28"' http://localhost:3000/posts/1
HTTP/1.1 304 Not Modified
Etag: "534279bfc931d4236713095ffd3efb28"
Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:44:46 GMT
Server: WEBrick/1.3.1 (Ruby/2.1.3/2014-09-19)
Notice we now receive a 304 Not Modified response, instructing our client that it can use its cached version of the content. Browsers will automatically send a long a stored ETag and Last-Modified timestamp with conditional caching headers for us so we do not actually have to do anything to use this in the browser.
Let’s take a look at the similar request with the If-Modified-Since
header:
curl -i -H 'If-Modified-Since: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:44:46 GMT' http://localhost:3000/posts/1
HTTP/1.1 304 Not Modified
Etag: "534279bfc931d4236713095ffd3efb28"
Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:44:46 GMT
Server: WEBrick/1.3.1 (Ruby/2.1.3/2014-09-19)
You’ll notice that we get the same results, the post has not been modified since the last time and we receive a 304 Not Modified response.
Conclusion
What have we gained through all of this? We are still making requests to our server to see if a resource has been modified before rendering.
To really understand what we’ve achieved we can take a look at our Rails log before we had caching:
Started GET "/posts/1" for 127.0.0.1 at 2014-11-12 11:33:57 -0500
Processing by PostsController#show as */*
Parameters: {"id"=>"1"}
Post Load (0.3ms) SELECT "posts".* FROM "posts" WHERE "posts"."id" = $1
LIMIT 1 [["id", 1]]
Rendered posts/show.html.erb within layouts/application (0.1ms)
Rendered application/_flashes.html.erb (0.0ms)
Rendered application/_analytics.html.erb (0.1ms)
Rendered application/_javascript.html.erb (16.1ms)
Completed 200 OK in 35ms (Views: 33.4ms | ActiveRecord: 0.3ms)
We can see that our request takes about 33ms and has to render our posts/show template within the layout along with some other partials. We can also see that most of our time is spent within that rendering process. ActiveRecord took less than a millisecond to run.
Next, let’s take a look at our log with conditional caching in place, and
put it to use by sending over a If-None-Match
header:
Started GET "/posts/1" for 127.0.0.1 at 2014-11-12 11:39:52 -0500
Processing by PostsController#show as */*
Parameters: {"id"=>"1"}
Post Load (0.3ms) SELECT "posts".* FROM "posts" WHERE "posts"."id" = $1
LIMIT 1 [["id", 1]]
Completed 304 Not Modified in 2ms (ActiveRecord: 0.3ms)
Notice we’ve cut off our entire rendering process from the request. Since the client’s cached response is fresh there is no reason for Rails to go through the rendering process. It can load in the post via ActiveRecord and verify if it has changed since the previous request.
Our requests went from taking about 33ms to complete to 2ms. That’s about a 94% improvement in performance. Not only is Rails skipping the rendering process, but our responses are now much lighter as they have no body to return.
This may not be much in our trivial example but for applications which have a lot of complicated logic behind rendering this can save lots of time.
Furthermore, these requests can be put in front of a public cache such as
Rack::Cache
to share a common cache for resources as opposed to a private
cache which is only utilized by the user’s browser.
Getting more
Our simple fresh_when
solution is not without its limitations.
It cannot handle user specific content. If we wanted to display anything different on a per-user basis (even if that’s the name in the header), we won’t be able to cache the content.
Another issue is that the cache is not being shared among users. Our performance gain is only realized when a single user looks at the same post over and over again.
Lastly, we’re limited to a simple render
call in our controller. What if we
wanted something more customized like render json:
or render xml:
? We’ll
build on top of what we’ve learned next time to overcome these limitations and
improve our caching even further.
Further reading
- Learn How to Evaluate Your Rails JSON API for Performance Improvements
- Learn about “Origin Pull” CDNs and how to use them in Rails in DNS to CDN to Origin